Published in Triathlete Magazine, May 2003
BY CHRISTOPHER KAUTZ & ERIC PARDYJAK
We all know you have to drink on the bike during races, particularly long hot races, in order to perform well. Not taking in enough fluids will lead to a drop in blood volume, which decreases your ability to produce power, and in cases of extreme dehydration, can end your day with a trip to the medical tent for an IV.
However, many athletes worry about giving up their aerodynamic advantage by carrying bottles on their bike, and have therefore experimented with different ways to minimize drag while staying hydrated. But for many athletes the question still remains: Where do I carry bottles in order to minimize aerodynamic losses while still being able to access my drinks?
Our goal in running this experiment was to measure the drag differences between the following drinking systems: no system at all (to determine a baseline), bottles on the frame, an aero bottle between the handlebars, a behind-the-saddle bottle carrier, and a prototype of the new NeverReach drinking system. Each of these systems was tested, with the athlete sitting on the bike then not drinking, and with the athlete taking a drink.
So, after spending all of the hours at the track, what did we discover? First, we learned that the most obvious effort athletes undertake to reduce drag— namely removing the bottle cages from their frames—is probably not worth the effort. Having established a baseline number to compare against, we found that we could not measure a drag difference by putting bottles on the bicycle, nor by putting an aero bottle between the handlebars. This held true both with the athlete drinking and not drinking (Note: the test rider we used is a professional cyclist who was able to take drinks from his frame while staying in the aerobars with one hand, not having to break his aero position to drink). An obvious advantage of the bottle in the aerobars is that any athlete can take a drink without breaking the aero position. We were quite surprised by this, as we would have predicted that both of these systems would have increased the drag on the rider a fair amount.
Second, we learned that while putting bottles in a carrier behind your saddle is a convenient way to carry extra fluids (and gear) on long training days, it is not a good idea from an aerodynamic perspective. Our testing showed that having bottles behind your saddle is akin to the flap being up on an airplane wing, which you probably know is the technique used to slow down planes. We found that simply having bottles behind the saddle slowed the athlete down by approximately 1 second per kilometer, or about three minutes over an Ironman! However, the time losses become much greater as an athlete begins reaching for his bottles and has to break his aero tuck. The idea that the aero advantages of putting bottles behind you is negated by sitting up did not surprise as, hut the fact that the bottles slowed you down so much simply by being back there was surprising.
Lastly, we reconfirmed what was tested in the early l990s with cyclists, which is that if you change the airflow off the back end of an athlete in the right way, you can significantly increase the speed of that athlete. The new NeverReach system is a teardrop that sits behind the athlete’s saddle. The athlete drinks from a tube that runs from the system to the front of the bike. The positioning and shape of the NeverReach is such that it works much like a fairing and significantly smoothes out the airflow coming off the athlete’s back. This leads to a timesavings of about 0.9 seconds per kilometer or about two minutes over an Ironman.
Test Description
CDA (Drag Coefficient % Difference)
Test Description Velocity in Miles Time over Time Difference
Test Description
|
CDA (Drag Coefficient and Frontal Area)
|
Percent Difference
from Baseline
|
|
Baseline – no drink system on bicycle
|
.344
|
N/A
|
|
NeverReach drink system
|
.335
|
-2.62
|
|
Aero drink bottle
|
.339
|
-1.45
|
|
Bottles on frame, drinking once per lap
|
.340
|
-1.16
|
|
Bottles on both down and seat tubes of frame
|
.347
|
+.87
|
|
Bottles behind saddle
|
.353
|
+2.55
|
|
Bottles behind saddle, drinking once per lap
|
.365
|
+6.10
|
Per hour 40k Over 40k
|
Test Description
|
Velocity in Miles per Hour
|
Time Over 40k
|
Time Difference over 40K
|
|
Baseline
|
22.14
|
67:22
|
N/A
|
|
NeverReach
|
22.33
|
66:47
|
- 35 seconds
|
|
Bottles behind saddle, drinking once per lap
|
21.70
|
68:02
|
+1:21 seconds to baseline, +1:56 to NeverReach
|
|
Bottles behind saddle, not drinking
|
21.93
|
68:02
|
+ 40 seconds to baseline, +1:15 to NeverReach
|
The bold numbers on the chart indicate measurements which are statistically significant. All other numbers are within measurement error of the testing and therefore cannot be differentiated from the baseline drag number. Once the above numbers were calculated, they were converted to velocity and time differences for those that were significant. The velocity and time
predictions were calculated using a power output of 200 watts. The predicted velocities and time are listed in the lower chart (with the behind-the-saddle drinking system assuming five drinks per hour for these calculations).
Once the above numbers had been calculated they were converted to velocity and time differences for those that exceeded measurement error. The velocity and time predictions were calculated using 200 watts.
In all, it was an interesting experiment, and one that taught us that putting your drinking system in the wrong place has a significant negative impact on performance Undoubtedly, many people will be surprised by the aerodynamic advantage one can gain (or lose) from proper placement.
Christopher and Eric make up PK Racing Technologies a research-based company specializing in bicycle positioning and equipment selection and testing. You can find them at www.pkcycling.com.
SPEED SIPPING
We track-tested several hydration systems to find out what’s most aerodynamic.
What works best? Here’s what our experts uncovered.